The recent arrest of activist and social media personality Martins Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has stirred widespread concern and public debate. Although the arrest was reportedly linked to allegations of cyberbullying or cyberstalking, the EFCC’s failure to release an official statement within 24 hours complicated the issue and triggered protests in parts of the country.
EFCC’s Mandate and Legal Scope.
The EFCC is primarily tasked with investigating and prosecuting financial and economic crimes such as fraud, money laundering, and embezzlement. While cybercrime is part of Nigeria’s expanding digital legal framework, offenses like cyberbullying and cyberstalking typically do not fall directly under the EFCC’s jurisdiction unless there is a financial dimension.
Understanding Cyberbullying and Cyberstalking in Nigeria.
Cyberbullying and cyberstalking involve the use of digital platforms to harass, intimidate, or defame individuals. These offenses have become more prevalent with the growth of social media, often leading to emotional, reputational, and sometimes psychological harm. However, they are usually handled by the Nigeria Police Force or specialized cybercrime units rather than the EFCC.
Why the EFCC May Step In.
Legal analysts suggest that the EFCC’s involvement in a cyberstalking case may be justified if the offense includes elements of financial fraud or if the alleged defamation results in economic loss. In VDM’s case, the commission is reportedly preparing multiple charges that could go beyond simple cyberbullying.
Still, the lack of an immediate public explanation for his arrest created an information vacuum, fueling speculation and public outrage.
You May Also Want to Read: VeryDarkMan’s Release Imminent Amid Legal Struggles and Nationwide Protests.
Jurisdictional Concerns: EFCC vs. Nigeria Police.
This case underscores the importance of defining clear jurisdictional boundaries among law enforcement agencies. While cyberbullying is serious, it does not inherently qualify as a financial crime. As such, cases involving online harassment without a financial component are generally the responsibility of the police or cybercrime units.
That said, in instances where online defamation affects businesses or individuals financially, EFCC intervention may be warranted.
More Read
The Need for a Clearer Legal Framework.
With the rapid rise in cyber-related offenses, experts argue that Nigeria needs a more robust and clearly defined legal structure to allocate responsibilities among its law enforcement bodies. Dedicated cybercrime units and clearer legislative guidelines would help ensure that cases are appropriately classified and handled.
You May Also Want to Read: Peter Obi Raises Alarm Over Threats to Nigeria’s Democracy.
The EFCC’s arrest of VeryDarkMan, and its delayed communication on the matter, highlights a broader issue—how Nigeria navigates the evolving landscape of cybercrime, legal jurisdiction, and public accountability. As the case unfolds, it offers an opportunity to reassess and strengthen the frameworks guiding digital law enforcement in the country.
