The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has followed through on its ultimatum by filing a lawsuit against Senate President Godswill Akpabio for failing to revoke what it deems an unlawful suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. SERAP had earlier demanded that Akpabio lift the suspension or face legal action, arguing that the decision violates her fundamental right to free speech.
In the lawsuit, filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja under suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/498/2025, SERAP argues that the Senate’s decision to suspend Akpoti-Uduaghan for six months—following allegations that she spoke without authorization and declined a new seating arrangement—violates fundamental rights. The suspension also entails withholding her salary and allowances and prohibiting her from identifying as a senator.
SERAP is seeking a court order mandating Akpabio to revoke the suspension, reinstate Akpoti-Uduaghan, and restore her legislative privileges. Additionally, the organization is requesting a perpetual injunction barring the Senate from imposing further disciplinary measures on her for exercising her fundamental rights.
The lawsuit further asserts that the application of Sections 6(1)(2) of the Senate Rules and the Senate Standing Orders 2023 (as amended) to justify the suspension is unconstitutional. SERAP insists that this action not only infringes upon Akpoti-Uduaghan’s rights but also disenfranchises her constituents, depriving them of effective political representation.
Furthermore, SERAP maintains that penalizing a senator for expressing opinions contradicts democratic values and sets a dangerous precedent. The organization stresses that public officeholders should uphold the principles of free expression rather than suppressing dissenting voices.
The case, filed by SERAP’s legal representatives Kolawole Oluwadare and Adelanke Aremo, argues that any legislative action must align with constitutional provisions and international human rights standards. It highlights the necessity for greater tolerance in political discourse, particularly when it involves government officials.
According to SERAP, the Senate’s actions undermine Nigeria’s obligations under Section 39 of the 1999 Constitution, Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. These provisions collectively safeguard individuals’ rights to receive and disseminate information freely.
In referencing these legal frameworks, SERAP underscores that the right to express one’s opinion is essential to a functioning democracy, ensuring transparency, accountability, and the protection of all fundamental rights.
As the legal battle unfolds, the court is yet to announce a date for the hearing, leaving the fate of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s legislative role hanging in the balance.